Skip to content

Brands need to be looking beyond International Women’s Day

Noemie Licini

|
Brands need to be looking beyond International Women’s Day

Now that International Women’s Day has passed, the real question for companies is not whether they spoke up on the 8th March, but what they do in the days and months that follow.

Genuine commitment to gender equality is not measured in posts or press releases, but instead is measured in the programmes companies run, the women they champion, and the platforms they create throughout the year. Every year, we see the same pattern: a flurry of activity around 8th March, followed by silence. The brands that get it right are those that treat International Women’s Day as the beginning of a conversation, rather than its conclusion.

The problem with performative communication

International Women’s Day has become an unmissable media moment, and with that visibility comes risk. The day has been widely co-opted by brands, giving rise to opportunistic campaigns and poorly framed messaging that audiences are increasingly good at spotting. When the public message does not match internal reality, media and stakeholders notice quickly, and the reputational damage can far outweigh any goodwill the original communication generated.

The most credible communications are grounded in facts and concrete commitments. Communicating on gender equality without sharing real data about your own organisation, whether that is pay gaps, access to leadership roles, parental leave policies or efforts to address recruitment bias, is where brands get caught out. Audiences and journalists are looking beyond the messaging now. They want to see the numbers, the initiatives and the honest acknowledgement of where progress still needs to happen.

That kind of transparency is not a reputational risk, but in actuality, it is a driver of trust.

What year round commitment actually looks like

So what does that actually look like in practice?  Here are three things brands can do to build a credible, sustained approach to gender equality throughout the year.

Back your communications with data: Publish precise figures, measurable commitments and medium term objectives. An annual internal review, shared publicly, grounds your communications in something tangible and builds a track record over time. Without it, any messaging around equality risks looking like just that – messaging.

Elevate women’s expertise consistently: Not just on International Women’s Day, but throughout the year. That means creating genuine platforms for women to speak as industry experts and thought leaders at events, in media commentary and in business decision making. Not to mark an occasion, but because their perspective adds real value. There is a difference between visibility and tokenism, and audiences know it.

Build initiatives with staying power. Mentoring and sponsorship schemes that open doors at every level, internal networks that give women a genuine voice, partnerships with organisations working on the ground, and leadership pipelines that move beyond intention into action. These are the commitments that matter, and they need a clear roadmap behind them, not just an announcement.

The credibility test

Before any communication, whether tied to a calendar moment or not, three questions are worth asking. Do we have measurable, verifiable data to support this? Are we prepared to answer questions about our figures and areas for improvement? And is this consistent with our actual policies and long term commitments?

If the answer to any of these is uncertain, the strategy needs more work.

Lasting credibility is built by the companies that do not need a calendar moment to justify their commitment.

The day may have passed. The work hasn’t.

Keep updated

Sign up to our weekly and monthly reads

Receive our weekly roundup of the top technology and business media stories and reputational advice as well as our insightful views on topics in the communications and technology space.


    Our views
    Here's what the Inside PR 2026 Report tells us about the state of the industry 11.03.2026

    Here's what the Inside PR 2026 Report tells us about the state of the industry

    Video revived the radio star 19.01.2026

    Video revived the radio star

    How to truly own the narrative 19.01.2026

    How to truly own the narrative

    Why you should never underestimate a comms professional 19.01.2026

    Why you should never underestimate a comms professional

    The Christmas ad season has arrived - and it’s telling us something important 17.11.2025

    The Christmas ad season has arrived - and it’s telling us something important

    Four shifts shaping PR in 2026 17.11.2025

    Four shifts shaping PR in 2026

    How PR in Europe really works 17.11.2025

    How PR in Europe really works

    Smarter, safer, or just louder? How AI comms must change in 2026 15.10.2025

    Smarter, safer, or just louder? How AI comms must change in 2026

    Why every company needs a crisis communications handbook 15.10.2025

    Why every company needs a crisis communications handbook

    How to write a PR brief that gets results in 2026 15.10.2025

    How to write a PR brief that gets results in 2026

    The deeply human joy of puzzles – and what it means for communicators 05.09.2025

    The deeply human joy of puzzles – and what it means for communicators

    When AI eats itself, what’s the future of content? 21.07.2025

    When AI eats itself, what’s the future of content?

    Salt in the wound – When storytelling crosses a line  21.07.2025

    Salt in the wound – When storytelling crosses a line 

    What we’re loving this summer for tech PRs   21.07.2025

    What we’re loving this summer for tech PRs  

    What a celebrity space flight taught us about PR 13.05.2025

    What a celebrity space flight taught us about PR

    Generative Engine Optimisation: The PR-led discipline reshaping brand visibility 13.05.2025

    Generative Engine Optimisation: The PR-led discipline reshaping brand visibility

    Is the future faceless leadership? 13.05.2025

    Is the future faceless leadership?

    Cancelled? There’s Cover for That 12.02.2025

    Cancelled? There’s Cover for That

    The year of the uncomplicated 12.02.2025

    The year of the uncomplicated

    My first encounter with an AI hallucination 22.11.2024

    My first encounter with an AI hallucination

    Why AI won’t be taking over from PR 25.10.2024

    Why AI won’t be taking over from PR

    Building a strong reputation in Europe – a comms checklist 25.10.2024

    Building a strong reputation in Europe – a comms checklist

    Strategic PR planning – how to prepare for the summer slowdown 23.07.2024

    Strategic PR planning – how to prepare for the summer slowdown

    Is VR growing up? 22.05.2024

    Is VR growing up?

    Spokespeople – navigating the social media tight rope 30.04.2024

    Spokespeople – navigating the social media tight rope

    Does cybersecurity have a comms problem? 20.03.2024

    Does cybersecurity have a comms problem?

    Setting Sail: Navigating the Business Seas with Reputation 12.03.2024

    Setting Sail: Navigating the Business Seas with Reputation

    Avoiding the pitfalls of impulsive PR 02.03.2024

    Avoiding the pitfalls of impulsive PR

    From potato to progress: Addressing communication breakdowns 04.02.2024

    From potato to progress: Addressing communication breakdowns

    Realistic Resolutions that Stick 02.12.2023

    Realistic Resolutions that Stick

    The powerful comms combo between strategy and creativity 18.10.2023

    The powerful comms combo between strategy and creativity

    The Rise of the Tech “LinkedInfluencer” 06.10.2023

    The Rise of the Tech “LinkedInfluencer”

    05.04.2023

    Employee advocacy: The secret to creating authentic communication

    Is the de-influencer movement another reputational hazard? 08.02.2023

    Is the de-influencer movement another reputational hazard?

    Should ‘share of admiration’ be a new reputation metric? 02.02.2023

    Should ‘share of admiration’ be a new reputation metric?